The whole cashew-raisin balance is askew!

Larry David has a spot on Huffington Post to blog about his thoughts and whatever. In three years he’s written 4 posts, so most of the time, his wacky genius ends up on the most hilarious tv no longer on cable television (Seinfeld and Curb Your Enthusiasm : “Hear the birds? Sometimes I like to pretend that I’m deaf and I try to imagine what it’s like not to be able to hear them. It’s not that bad. “). So when he does write publicly, there’s got to be a few gems.

He’s been lured back to his PC based on the Hillary phone ad:

I watched, transfixed, as she took the 3 a.m. call…and I was afraid…very afraid. Suddenly, I realized the last thing this country needs is that woman anywhere near a phone. I don’t care if it’s 3 a.m. or 10 p.m. or any other time. I don’t want her talking to Putin, I don’t want her talking to Kim Jong Il, I don’t want her talking to my nephew.

And his thoughts on her next steps:

There have been times in this campaign when she seemed so unhinged that I worried she’d actually kill herself if she lost. Every day, she reminds me more and more of Adele H., who also had an obsession that drove her insane.

She needs a long rest. She needs to put on a sarong and some sun block and get away from things for a while, a nice beach somewhere — somewhere far away, where there are…no phones.

The full blog and even his reading of it here.

HRC’s shortsided strategy- Me or No Democrate for President?

Hillary has quoted for now for at least the third time in a week how McCain is a great friend, would make a great candidate for president and he has the experience. *SMOOCHES!* How do you beat a presidential candidate when you feed their fire and continue to say he’s qualified to be president?

“I think you’ll be able to imagine many things Senator McCain will be able to say,” she said. “He’s never been the president, but he will put forth his lifetime of experience. I will put forth my lifetime of experience.”

If she were to win the nod, doesn’t she think this will come back to bite her? McCain: “Hey look… even Hillary would vote for me so why shouldn’t you?”

Alas, she is very close friends with McCain, even convincing him to participate in getting shitfaced on Vodka in Estonia. And McCain put it well “What happens in Estonia stays in Estonia,” (now that’s a reference to experience don’t you think?):

And then there’s this thing about her not wanting people to know what she’s deducted in taxs over the years… no disclosure?. Hillary is saying she won’t release her returns until after she’s been made the nominee. This is contrary to historical practice. What is she hiding now? Maybe she’s trying to hid the 10,000% cattle-futures profits made in 1979 and 1978 which were hidden from us as well when Bill Clinton divulged his returns before his nod. Talk about having experience… in scandal!!!!

The costs of the war

Obviously there are lives lost in war and these are very tangible losses to friends and family. But reciently I brought up the perspective that what if this war was actually thought more of a business venture. That the US government were the Board of directors or CEO, and the American tax payers were the shareholders. How long would this venture provide value? What are the benefits? Are we safer? Short/quick lines for public transport a lost convenience for safety? Is our military being taken care of, on and off the battle field? Do the people outside the US perceive us as a better country? Are we a better country now?

In terms of costs, it’s been reciently told that this war will cost the US tax payers 3 Trillion dollars (it’s at 2 Trillion now). I can hardly grasp how much that actually is. The actual costs of the war have gone through little scrutiny as the Bush administration has appropriated funds via “emergency” funding processes that bypass normal process and rebuttal.

Read this NYTime op-ed – The $2 Trillion Nightmare:

Mr. Hormats: “Normally, when America goes to war, nonessential spending programs are reduced to make room in the budget for the higher costs of the war. Individual programs that benefit specific constituencies are sacrificed for the common good … And taxes have never been cut during a major American war. For example, President Eisenhower adamantly resisted pressure from Senate Republicans for a tax cut during the Korean War.”

Said Mr. Stiglitz: “Because the administration actually cut taxes as we went to war, when we were already running huge deficits, this war has, effectively, been entirely financed by deficits. The national debt has increased by some $2.5 trillion since the beginning of the war, and of this, almost $1 trillion is due directly to the war itself … By 2017, we estimate that the national debt will have increased, just because of the war, by some $2 trillion.”

Certainly by personal experience, I know that I can’t survive by spending more and not increasing my income when I’m already in debt. Eventually my ability to purchase new items and services becomes crippled. As a corporation, I would feel that this practice has run its course and it’s time to cut your losses. The general term heard often is throwing good money after bad or psychologically speaking Irrational Escalation. For what will this war and resulting debt lead our country into. Will Americans be able to afford themselves the basic necessities like fuel and goods that are all outsourced? This remains to be scene but if the progression of our economy already into a recession is a clue for anything, we aren’t in for a good path.