HRC’s shortsided strategy- Me or No Democrate for President?

Hillary has quoted for now for at least the third time in a week how McCain is a great friend, would make a great candidate for president and he has the experience. *SMOOCHES!* How do you beat a presidential candidate when you feed their fire and continue to say he’s qualified to be president?

“I think you’ll be able to imagine many things Senator McCain will be able to say,” she said. “He’s never been the president, but he will put forth his lifetime of experience. I will put forth my lifetime of experience.”

If she were to win the nod, doesn’t she think this will come back to bite her? McCain: “Hey look… even Hillary would vote for me so why shouldn’t you?”

Alas, she is very close friends with McCain, even convincing him to participate in getting shitfaced on Vodka in Estonia. And McCain put it well “What happens in Estonia stays in Estonia,” (now that’s a reference to experience don’t you think?):

And then there’s this thing about her not wanting people to know what she’s deducted in taxs over the years… no disclosure?. Hillary is saying she won’t release her returns until after she’s been made the nominee. This is contrary to historical practice. What is she hiding now? Maybe she’s trying to hid the 10,000% cattle-futures profits made in 1979 and 1978 which were hidden from us as well when Bill Clinton divulged his returns before his nod. Talk about having experience… in scandal!!!!

One Reply to “HRC’s shortsided strategy- Me or No Democrate for President?”

  1. It’s clear she doesn’t know the meaning of the words ‘class’ or ‘dignity’, however it’s also clear she stands little chance of winning the nomination. It’s a question of simple mathematics at this point, and Obama has the numbers overwhelmingly on his side. Good riddance, Hillary.

Comments are closed.