Is there ever enough “Wealth “?

“The real source of wealth and capital in this new era is not material things.. it is the human mind, the human spirit, the human imagination, and our faith in the future.”

Read that quote again. Fairly profound, you’d think this was said by a leader, a philosopher or some other humanist of our time. No. Steve Forbes said this. I have no idea of context but for some reason, I think what came right after this was the quote “Pppppppfffffffftttttt… If you believe that crap, I have a bridge to sell you…”

Noel Whittaker a financial author and investment advisor said it better: “Becoming wealthy is like playing Monopoly.. the person who can accumulate the most assets wins the game.”

What constitutes as Wealthy or Rich today in Noel’s terms? Is there a bar that you can mark that says, as soon as I have accumulated this percentage of assets, or XYZ capital, or own some number of high profile items with a steady cash flow, that’s a mark for rich. Is an income of $400,000 a year rich?

This presidential political season and subsequent recession has created a climate of concern for many middle class to wealthy Americans that feel their choice for conspicuous consumption is being limited by new tax laws (Obama’s tax plan) and possibly as the Washington Post puts it “social proof”.

The Journal has an article today called Wealth-Less Effect: Earning Well, Feeling Otherwise; where those just over $250,000 income levels are feeling pinched to cut back and even “forced” to curb living habits they feel they deserve at their income levels. As the Journal puts it:

It is a tricky situation in which some Americans find themselves after a long boom: They are by no means struggling, compared with the 98% of Americans who make far less, but depending on where they live and the lifestyle choices they have made, they don’t necessarily feel rich, either. Worse, in their view, they are facing the same tax rates as those making millions. Some of the expenses are self-inflicted — like private-school costs and conspicuous consumption. Others, though, are unavoidable, like child-care costs, larger health-care deductibles and education expenses, especially college.

The reality is that the median income earner in America is just over $50,000:

2.245 Million households in American, had income greater than $250,000 in 2007 which is actually 1.9% of the total household earners in America. These articles try to convey these rich people are saddled with:

Our capitalistic society has created an environment of spenders regardless if those purchases are necessary or warranted. The majority of expenses, our flat screen TVs, luxury cars, designer clothes, immaculate multi-room houses all emulate a personal choice and even social entitlement within the circles of friends and community these people reside.

As Daniel Gross writes in Slate, those that earn $250,000 in Greenwich, CT would certainly look to be poor based on their neighbor’s affluence (median income levels of $231,138, however, income at that level in Mississippi would represent top earners of most towns (median income of $35,971).

I find it interesting that either by choice or social proof, these earners must finally now evaluate their spending habits and re-align them to reality. All Americans have fallen into this trap of spending beyond our means, and we’ve all checked our spending to accommodate an uncertain future. It’s, however, comical to me for those that make a considerable income more than my family must now whine that they no longer can consume as they so desire.

This mentality of entitlement permeates all classes and whether you’re poor or rich, what ever level of income you do have, never seems to be enough. I hope that Steve Forbes is right, and more people take stock in the human mind, spirit, and imagination for our future.

Jeff Hunt: Profesional Dick to Kids

If you’re the director of an educational facility, a PhD authority on the Civil War and public reference specifically to the Last Battle of the Civil War: Palmetto Ranch, it only seems natural when a group of high school students who’ve created a 10- by 5-foot diorama (with materials worth $23,000, and taking 7,000 hours of labor worth between $60,000 and $130,000) of the battle which deemed by this “expert” to be not completely accurate, what’s your natural response?

Take your arm and back-swapped the whole thing, completely trashing the work and dismantling the piece before even displaying it to the public, of course!’

No attempt to have the kids correct the errors or even displaying with notation of inaccuracies.

Unprofessional, and unbecoming of a mentor in the field of public education.

AZ Central News Article
Community Forum on the matter

The Emperor Clearly has no Clothes but it seems that Nudity is now in Fashion.

On Dec. 3rd, the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) declassified a report that had been released to the current administration intelligence group as late as August of this year, that “with high confidence that in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program“. The next day, Tuesday the Prez stated that he was never forewarned of the current intelligence communities’ report on Iran. This coming out because the report was released to the administration in August, so what he’s saying is at no point in the last 3 months, did anyone let him know… “Uh W, there could be a chance that Iran hasn’t been working towards this nuke goal…” And during that same time, he continued to spout that the Iranians were hell bent on getting these weapons as well as we should be watching them to start WWIII (Bush speech Oct. 18th, 2007).

This intelligence report is now coming under fire from the GOP why? Well: 1) because it contradicts a 2005 report that stated Iran is 10 years from creating a nuke weapon and 2) because the GOP believe the NIE is now politicizing it’s reports (all of the sudden they are NOW favoring a political parties agenda… imagine that), OR 3) could it be that this contradicts the planned agenda and rhetoric the GOP has been throwing up all over America that Iran is a bigger threat than the reality?

The NIE defends it’s report (Vanee Vines, spokeswoman for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), defended the report, saying that each NIE is a “group exercise” involving the “entire intelligence community.”) and white house stands by the intelligence communities information (this time) as it’s a coordinated and group effort made up of many agencies and people, and NOT created by just a few political hacks that ignore real intelligence and like a bad reality show, edit together a report to fit their own storyline.

This Bushian etymology was tracked by Dan Froomkin at the Washington Post’s website and shows a time line of his public statements, and how they have evolved as the evolution of intelligence on Iran has come to light – some interesting changes in message can be noted around the time the new intelligence was presented to the administration:

March 31st 2007: “Iran is trying to develop a nuclear weapon…”

June 5th 2007: Iran’s “pursuit of nuclear weapons…”

June 19th 2007: “consequences to the Iranian government if they continue to pursue a nuclear weapon…”

July 12th 2007: “the same regime in Iran that is pursuing nuclear weapons…”

August 6th 2007: “this is a government that has proclaimed its desire to build a nuclear weapon…”

Notice a pattern?

Then as Froomkin asserts around early August the rhetoric changes (McConnell, or someone, must have briefed him then, however, Bush only says that new information was available, however, he wasn’t told what it was):

August 9th: “They have expressed their desire to be able to enrich uranium, which we believe is a step toward having a nuclear weapons program…”

August 28th: “Iran’s active pursuit of technology that could lead to nuclear weapons…”

October 4th: “you should not have the know-how on how to make a (nuclear) weapon…”

October 17th: “until they suspend and/or make it clear that they, that their statements aren’t real, yeah, I believe they want to have the **capacity**, the **knowledge**, in order to make a nuclear weapon.”

Before August 9th, it’s: Trying to develop, build or pursue a nuclear weapon.

After August 9th, it’s: Desire, pursuit, want…knowledge technology know-how to enrich uranium.

The National Intelligence Estimate this week talks of the Iranians suspending their nuclear weapons program in 2003, yet, still try to push the threat of Iran even though it’s become visible that his tone has changed and he may have lied to the general public about the threat of Iran…. sound familiar??? *Cough* Iraq…

It’s ultimately become clear though, (and if it hasn’t already) that this new information has irreparably damaged American credibility regarding international policy efforts. In my mind it looks like we have someone that has lied to the nation about the treat of violence from another nation, in a time where American resources are already drawn thin in areas of the world that are not immediately threating to home soil interests.

I knew one earlier president that lied and was impeached… he lied about the relationship between himself and an intern – something no where near the threat to civil liberties or American safety as would be lying about the threat of nuclear war.