Tag: Barack Obama

Posted on

Pandering to the non-elite

Many of the reasons people dislike politics include: 1) the exorbitant amount of money paid on “campaigning” for the job including advertising both for your points and pointing out your opponents “flaws” when even a fraction of which could feed, cloth and educate not only Africa but much of our own country, 2) attempt to cast themselves as central to the political spectrum as possible even though once elected their true intentions and beliefs become reveled, 3) but mostly I think one of the biggest peeves of voters is politicians whom are puppets to the “issues” within the markets and polls they are about to pitch to and then they pander shamelessly to those markets knowing full well just last week they made a completely different pitch or character.

The latest in the Hill camp is the position against Obama that he’s made some comments perceived by her campaign as a position of “elitism” mean while she touts her past as a gun toting church girl that grew up shooting behind the barn at the lake.

She’s been going on and on about this sound bite and that she’s an every woman, can hack it with the blue collar folk in PA but when asked when the last time she fired a gun or attended church services she responds “is not a relevant question in this debate” and “We can answer that some other time,”….”I went to church on Easter. I mean, so?” What the fuck is that BS? She’s the one making and issue yet she’s not one to own up to her own representation of an Indianan or a west Penn tax payer.

There’s been a lot of attacks on Obama’s statement that the working man are bitter which is where this whole “elitist” comment came out of and ya know what.. yes people are bitter of the direction of this country has gone with the economy, the war and now the polticing that has been played. Here’s a few PA residents both parroting Barack’s comments that the people are bitter.. received by surprisingly Faux News

Hill now takes this pandering completely out of control by drinking budwiper with the PA steel works, then turning Hyde by getting pressured into taking shots of Canadian whiskey: Crown Royal… a non-American cocktail served in a violet velvet satchel named with two of the most “elite” words in English language. Next she wants to claim Barack is elite? Get the fuck out of here again!

By the way… What’s a definition of “elite”? – representing the most choice, select or the best

If that’s the case then yeah… maybe Hill is right on… Obama is an elite candidate for the Presidency.

Posted on

Obama and Hill’s Voting Record in Senate

Anyone who has been around politics, and is honest, realizes that there are a lot of reasons why a Senator votes one way or another on bills or misses votes. However an examination of the bills that each of these Senators cared enough about to author and introduce revealed much to me: what they care about, what their priorities are, how they tackle problems. And the list of co-sponsors showed something about how they lead, inspire and work with others. Finally, looking at which bills actually passed is pretty indicative of how effective each would be at getting things done.

Obama has introduced bills on health care, energy, Iran, voting, veterans, global warming, campaign finance and lobbyists, Blackwater, global poverty, nuclear proliferation, and education.

Obama appears to have a better record last year in the Senate on getting his bills and amendments passed than does Clinton.

Obama is a leader. With bigger majorities in Congress, much of his agenda should sail through. He can inspire this country to change course on so many things, from health care to global warming, where attitudes have to be changed first. I remember Bill Clinton’s endless laundry lists of small, focus group approved initiatives. For those who say Hillary will not govern like Bill did, I respond that the people who were doing the market testing of his proposed policies were Dick Morris, of course, and Mark Penn, who is now running Hillary’s campaign.

From Daily KOS

Posted on

HRC’s shortsided strategy- Me or No Democrate for President?

Hillary has quoted for now for at least the third time in a week how McCain is a great friend, would make a great candidate for president and he has the experience. *SMOOCHES!* How do you beat a presidential candidate when you feed their fire and continue to say he’s qualified to be president?

“I think you’ll be able to imagine many things Senator McCain will be able to say,” she said. “He’s never been the president, but he will put forth his lifetime of experience. I will put forth my lifetime of experience.”

If she were to win the nod, doesn’t she think this will come back to bite her? McCain: “Hey look… even Hillary would vote for me so why shouldn’t you?”

Alas, she is very close friends with McCain, even convincing him to participate in getting shitfaced on Vodka in Estonia. And McCain put it well “What happens in Estonia stays in Estonia,” (now that’s a reference to experience don’t you think?):

And then there’s this thing about her not wanting people to know what she’s deducted in taxs over the years… no disclosure?. Hillary is saying she won’t release her returns until after she’s been made the nominee. This is contrary to historical practice. What is she hiding now? Maybe she’s trying to hid the 10,000% cattle-futures profits made in 1979 and 1978 which were hidden from us as well when Bill Clinton divulged his returns before his nod. Talk about having experience… in scandal!!!!