Tag: Election 08

Posted on

An overlooked issue in to consider in the 08 Election

From the Atlantic two weeks ago:

Three of the five Justices in the majority — John Paul Stevens (age 88), Ruth Bader Ginsburg (age 75) and David Souter (age 68) — are widely expected by court observers to retire or otherwise leave the Court in the first term of the next President. By contrast, the four judges who dissented — Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, John Roberts and Sam Alito — are expected to stay right where they are for many years to come.

John McCain has identified Roberts and Alito as ideal justices of the type he would nominate, while Barack Obama has identified Stephen Breyer, David Souter and Ginsberg (all in the majority today). It’s not hyperbole to say that, from Supreme Court appointments alone, our core constitutional protections could easily depend upon the outcome of the 2008 election.

Another Republican cannot be allowed in the White House. Saving the Supreme Court and, with it, the Bill of Rights, is more important than getting out of Iraq.

That’s a red herring, a Supreme court justice will have to be approved by the Democratic senate, so you are very unlikely to get a judge who would vote against Roe v. Wade etc etc

Only two justices appointed by Democrats are left. Do you really want a Supreme Court even more unbalanced than the one we have now?

Obama was a constitutional law professor. He knows the constitution. And how refreshing would it be to have a court that understands the constitution?

Posted on

I got 99 problems and Clinton ain’t one of em

I think I just posted on how the American people dislike politicing as a reason why they don’t get more involved… It doesn’t help when you have mass media fuck up the whole process and promote superficial gossip and pedestrian issues in their “debate” that have already been hashed out for months and of which have no real reflection on resolving issues for the American people.



“It took us 45 minutes before we even started talking about a single issue that matters to the American people…” – Obama spoke the next day.

ABC held the twenty-something Democratic debate in Philli with hosts George Stephanopoulos and Charles Gibson on a very key night as this being the last meeting from the “big” primary on Tuesday in PA and probably the last chance to debate the issues before the Democratic Nomination is cast. Of course with such an opportunity, ABC hooked up with TMZ and Fox News to present a meaningful, sought after debate on reverends, bosnia, weather ungrd, lapel pins, american patriotism, the dream ticket and would you support the other in the final race.

True, true. It wasn’t until the 16th question that the “Number one issue” was asked on the economy. Some questions that were not raised during this debate:

  • How they will deal with the crumbling American infrastructure
  • Scuttling NAFTA or try to fix it?
  • Is China an adversary or allie?
  • What’s your take on the Tibetan protests?
  • If we get out of Iraq, and Al-Qaeda got back in, would the US go back?
  • Is there a plan to end military forces in Afghanistan?
  • Will you, as president, initiate American military action against terrorists residing in Pakistan?
  • What plans do you have to reverse the trend to outsource American jobs internationally?
  • What steps will you take to improve and/or promote national to local public transportation?
  • What will you do for the American service men to either expand time between service calls and/or shortening service time in the field?
  • Policies regarding undocumented workers
  • How to fix no child left behind? Further the education of our children?

Obama raises a great point – what was that BS? The “main stream media” has announced the real loser of the debate was ABC, but I maintain that it was really the American people for ABC obviously does not respect or think to highly of the intellect of it’s viewers to only spend 39 minutes of a 2 hour debate on real topics. No wonder the crowd turned on Gibson and Stephan.

Quite possibly, this whole show was a set up from the Clinton side. Of course no one really pointed out that George Stephanopoulos was the Communications Director for Clinton’s campaign and Bill Clinton’s most senior and closest personal aide until he resigned the position in Bill’s 2nd term amid pressures of poor ethics and disheartened by Bill’s sexual encounters (and lying about them) in the white house. Conflict of interest? Well this wasn’t the first time that Stephanopoulos let his bias out – what about grilling Edwards early on in this process?

Through it all, Obama has a good attitude about all this – stay above the fray and work for a better politics of tomorrow. Brush your shoulders off:

STEPHANOPOULOS: Do you think Senator Obama can beat John McCain or not?
CLINTON: Yes, yes, yes….

I guess that “experience” argument is done?

Posted on

Pandering to the non-elite

Many of the reasons people dislike politics include: 1) the exorbitant amount of money paid on “campaigning” for the job including advertising both for your points and pointing out your opponents “flaws” when even a fraction of which could feed, cloth and educate not only Africa but much of our own country, 2) attempt to cast themselves as central to the political spectrum as possible even though once elected their true intentions and beliefs become reveled, 3) but mostly I think one of the biggest peeves of voters is politicians whom are puppets to the “issues” within the markets and polls they are about to pitch to and then they pander shamelessly to those markets knowing full well just last week they made a completely different pitch or character.

The latest in the Hill camp is the position against Obama that he’s made some comments perceived by her campaign as a position of “elitism” mean while she touts her past as a gun toting church girl that grew up shooting behind the barn at the lake.

She’s been going on and on about this sound bite and that she’s an every woman, can hack it with the blue collar folk in PA but when asked when the last time she fired a gun or attended church services she responds “is not a relevant question in this debate” and “We can answer that some other time,”….”I went to church on Easter. I mean, so?” What the fuck is that BS? She’s the one making and issue yet she’s not one to own up to her own representation of an Indianan or a west Penn tax payer.

There’s been a lot of attacks on Obama’s statement that the working man are bitter which is where this whole “elitist” comment came out of and ya know what.. yes people are bitter of the direction of this country has gone with the economy, the war and now the polticing that has been played. Here’s a few PA residents both parroting Barack’s comments that the people are bitter.. received by surprisingly Faux News

Hill now takes this pandering completely out of control by drinking budwiper with the PA steel works, then turning Hyde by getting pressured into taking shots of Canadian whiskey: Crown Royal… a non-American cocktail served in a violet velvet satchel named with two of the most “elite” words in English language. Next she wants to claim Barack is elite? Get the fuck out of here again!

By the way… What’s a definition of “elite”? – representing the most choice, select or the best

If that’s the case then yeah… maybe Hill is right on… Obama is an elite candidate for the Presidency.