New York Pole Tax Proposed

Felix Ortiz, a Brooklyn Democrat assemblyman introduced a bill on March 11th, that would require patrons of any NY State strip club, to pay and extra $10 cover charge, oops I mean “tax”, every time they enter the club or topless joint. Felix claims the new tax could raise as much as $500 million for victims of human trafficking, domestic violence, sexual abuse and child prostitution.

So it’s a NY style government shake down???

For one, I’ve found these type of taxes very unreasonable for several reasons. The Gov has no transparency so there’s really nothing public that can be used to track this tax back to the very programs he’s proposing. I see this as yet another “tax” generated by the NY state assemble and primarily pushed by Gov. Paterson, to minimize the state’s $14 billion budget deficit which ultimately will be forced upon New York City residents. Also been proposed are taxes on internet downloads such as mp3s and movies, including those in the Adult entertainment business.

Apparently states have increasingly turned to the adult-entertainment industry, this and the booze industry, which are the only ones still making money, to help close budget gaps in recent years.

NY isn’t the first, Texas lawmakers pitched a bill which would require a $5 “pole tax” which was later found to be unconstitutional by a state judge. Judge Scott Jenkins wrote that the fee, “while furthering laudable goals, violates the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is therefore invalid.”

“The bottom line is, we have to protect people who have been victimized by unscrupulous individuals, and we cannot continue, especially in this economy, to have government pay for everything,” Ortiz said.

Fuck you Ortiz! Entering a strip clubs is a protected First Amendment activity. There hasn’t been any evidence provided that combining alcohol (or zero alcohol for full nude clubs) with topless erotic dancing correlates to sexual assaults, domestic violence or contributes to child prostitution. Where is the straight line from child porn/prostitution to adult entertainment? He’s just proposed taking more money away from law abiding citizens (both the patrons and the dancers as this would effect how much a participant contributes to the activity) so essentially the govt CAN pay for unrelated services.

Stripping may be politically unpopular, it is a guaranteed right for the citizens of the state and the US. Even if the state were to get by the constitutionality of the tax, there is no plausibly good reason that tax code should be a substitute for the criminal code. No one would object to contributing to educating and preventing sexually related crimes, however, I would hope communities locally and societies everywhere would want to fund such programs generally.

T-Pain – I’m in Love with a Stripper
[audio: http://www.box.net/shared/static/fuae6uqog0.mp3]

I like living in the most unaffordable city

The National Association of Home Builders released last month their Housing Opportunity Index covering the most and least affordable cities in the country. Here’s a quick rundown of the top 10 metropolitan areas with a population over 500,000.

Ten Least Affordable Cities

1. New York-White Plains-Wayne, NY-NJ
2. San Francisco-San mateo-Redwood City, CA
3. Nassau-Suffolk, NY
4. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA
5. Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL
6. Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, CA
7. El Paso, TX
8. Newark-Union, NJ-PA
9. Honolulu, HI
10. Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA

Ten Most Affordable CitiesW

1. Indianapolis-Carmel, IN
2. Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI
3. Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA
4. Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn, MI
5. Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI
6. Syracuse, NY
7. Dayton, OH
8. Akron, OH
9. Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH
10. Scranton-Wilkes-Barre, PA

No one wants to live in these cities, that’s why they are so “affordable”. There’s more to a city than having cheap rent but if the big city isn’t your thing, you may be more interested in checking into the most and least affordable cities under 500,000:

Ten Least Affordable Cities with a Population Under 500,000

1. San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA
2. Ocean City, NJ
3. Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA
4. Napa, CA
5. Flagstaff, AZ
6. Medford, OR
7. Bend, OR
8. Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA
9. St. George, UT
10. Laredo, TX

So I’ve lived in SLO and even at the time I can see the rents going up, but this is primarily because the city refuses to build out to accomodate the increasing demand of the University there. 10 years ago, the city was about 55,000 population, of that 36,000 were college students and the rest were bartenders or retired folks.

Ten Most Affordable Cities with a Population Under 500,000

1. Lansing-East Lansing, MI
2. Sandusky, OH
3. Lima, OH
4. Springfield, OH
5. Bay City, MI
6. Battle Creek, MI
7. Canton-Massillon, OH
8. Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI
9. Utica-Rome, NY
10. Binghamton, NY

Finanical Advice from the media?

The stock market wealth liquidation has been a top story of the national economy even before the election of a new president. Not only have the rich had to sell their art collections, hold tapper down from buying that big island to more of a shared 5th vacation home, but the indirect investors in the stock market have been hit through what they thought was their retirement fund, now gone to pre-employment numbers. So the association that this epic fail of the financial community is some how related to the changing of the guard is absurd.

A few weeks back we had the now infamous rant by Rick Santelli, of CNBC’s Squawk Box, on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange trading floor, arousing the crowd against the bail out of the “loser homeowners” amid the continuing bailout of the financial institutions, insurance agencies and automotive industry is hypocritical at best. He’s cry for action isn’t for anyone but the same bunch of greedy scumbags who caused the financial breakdown and now want to blame the working people of the country for it. Here’s the original:

So John Stewart invited Santelli on to his show because of the media coverage the above clip stirred. Days before, he cancels on John, and much like David Letterman responded on the John McCain cancellation, John spends the 8 minutes dedicated to the interview to skewer Santelli and his network CNBC for their own contribution to the false comfort and horrible forecast of today’s economic theater (although it’s been said that the clip was to be played before the interview):

Yes, as John says and this applies to Cramer, Rick, the guys behind Rick and those like him: Fuck You!